10-28-2009, 11:42 AM
Hi,
Option 1 works well, On setting as per option2, the execution flow was action1 executed twice then
action2 executed twice then
action3 executed twice not in the expected order (action1->action2->action3 with the values from row1 then action1->action2->action3 with the values from row2)
Option 1 works well, On setting as per option2, the execution flow was action1 executed twice then
action2 executed twice then
action3 executed twice not in the expected order (action1->action2->action3 with the values from row1 then action1->action2->action3 with the values from row2)