New To UFT? Join the best UFT Training Online!

Micro Focus QTP (UFT) Forums › Micro Focus UFT (earlier known as QTP) › UFT / QTP Beginners v
Local and Shared Object Repositiories - Should a Test Have Both?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Local and Shared Object Repositiories - Should a Test Have Both?
Vilkas1 Offline
Junior Member
**
Posts: 11
Threads: 6
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 0
#1
Solved: 11 Years, 4 Months ago 08-27-2009, 03:56 AM
Hi,

I'm new to QTP and would like to know if my test should have both a local and a shared object repository. I want the shared object repository but it seems having the local also is redundant, isn't it?

Thanks,
Brian
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Local and Shared Object Repositiories - Should a Test Have Both? - by Vilkas1 - 08-27-2009, 03:56 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Updating Shared repository vinod_3466 3 4,522 06-29-2016, 02:16 PM
Last Post: Ankesh
  Local System Monitor kbhargava505 0 2,524 10-16-2015, 12:52 PM
Last Post: kbhargava505
  QTP 11 - CreateFolder fails to create folder in shared network drive from Windows 7 Pallavi 3 3,604 02-25-2014, 02:04 PM
Last Post: guin.anirban
  How to Create and use local repository Sourabh146 2 2,549 01-28-2014, 10:56 PM
Last Post: jacosta
  What is Window Test Object adityasrinivasb 0 2,160 10-23-2013, 12:32 PM
Last Post: adityasrinivasb

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)