Hi All !
Thanks for this fantastic forum !
First of all i apologize if am wrong ( i have just used QTP for couple of hours !
here is my question :
I have just got the trial version of QTP running on my machine and start already going through the handbook .
In fact i would like to have your opinion regarding the following :
QTP is of the type of record and playback
which i think its not nice at all ,if the future system will be build under
Agile / scrum methodology meaning that the automated tester using it
for example has to wait till "premature" system is running then he can start testing : in other words the automated tester relies heavily on the output of programmers ( Quality Assurance is not done correctly if you imagine that the requirement was not implemented correctly hence the automated tester wont
see it.( might require Manual testing before starting the automation one )
In the other hand httpunit gives the opportunity to the
automated tester to build his test cases at early stage based on the
requirement rather then on the system (even before implementation ).
Here it guide the developer to test his work before committing his changes .
I guess as QA person the job will be done better with this kind of software.
With record and playback its more easy doesnt require to learn coding
I would like to have your opinions if i see things with right glasses
Thanks Again
yacine
Thanks for this fantastic forum !
First of all i apologize if am wrong ( i have just used QTP for couple of hours !
here is my question :
I have just got the trial version of QTP running on my machine and start already going through the handbook .
In fact i would like to have your opinion regarding the following :
QTP is of the type of record and playback
which i think its not nice at all ,if the future system will be build under
Agile / scrum methodology meaning that the automated tester using it
for example has to wait till "premature" system is running then he can start testing : in other words the automated tester relies heavily on the output of programmers ( Quality Assurance is not done correctly if you imagine that the requirement was not implemented correctly hence the automated tester wont
see it.( might require Manual testing before starting the automation one )
In the other hand httpunit gives the opportunity to the
automated tester to build his test cases at early stage based on the
requirement rather then on the system (even before implementation ).
Here it guide the developer to test his work before committing his changes .
I guess as QA person the job will be done better with this kind of software.
With record and playback its more easy doesnt require to learn coding
I would like to have your opinions if i see things with right glasses
Thanks Again
yacine